Escala Humpty Dumpty: adaptação transcultural e validação para cultura brasileira / Escala Humpty Dumpty: adaptación transcultural y validación para la cultura brasileña / The Humpty Dumpty Scale: cross-cultural adaptation and validation for Brazilian culture

Resumo Objetivo Adaptar e validar a The Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale para a cultura brasileira. Métodos Estudo metodológico, que seguiu, para a adaptação transcultural, os estágios de tradução, síntese, retrotradução, avaliação por especialistas, pré-teste e avaliação pela autora do instrumento original. Foram selecionadas 103 crianças/adolescentes internados em um hospital público do interior do estado de São Paulo. Foram utilizados ficha de caracterização, The Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale e o Instrumento de Classificação de Pacientes Pediátricos, o qual foi utilizado para avaliar a validade de construto, com o coeficiente de correlação de Spearman. A confiabilidade interobservador foi avaliada pelo Coeficiente de Correlação Intraclasse e pelo coeficiente Kappa. Resultados O comitê de 12 especialistas avaliou as equivalências, a clareza e a relevância dos itens e, após três rodadas, foi alcançado o percentual de 100% de concordância. As reformulações tornaram os itens mais compreensíveis e, após avaliação da autora, foi obtida a versão final do instrumento. Correlações positivas e significantes foram encontradas entre a Escala Humpty Dumpty e os domínios Paciente (r=0,5184; p<0,0001) e Procedimentos terapêuticos (r=0,2143; p<0,0332) do instrumento de classificação de pacientes. Com o domínio Família (r=0,0676; p=0,5060), não foram alcançadas relações significantes. Evidências satisfatórias de confiabilidade (Coeficiente de Correlação Intraclasse de 0,93 e coeficiente Kappa de 0,80) foram observadas. Conclusão The Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale foi adaptada transculturalmente, sendo denominada Ferramenta de Avaliação de Risco de Queda - Escala Humpty Dumpty. Demonstrou evidências satisfatórias de validade e confiabilidade para avaliar o risco de queda em crianças e adolescentes, no cenário brasileiro.

Resumen Objetivo Adaptar y validar The Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale para la cultura brasileña. Métodos Estudio metodológico, en el que se realizaron las siguientes etapas para la adaptación transcultural: traducción, síntesis, retrotraducción, evaluación por especialistas, prueba piloto y evaluación por la autora del instrumento original. Se seleccionaron 103 infantes/adolescentes internados en un hospital público del interior del estado de São Paulo. Se utilizó la ficha de caracterización, The Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale y el Instrumento de Clasificación de Pacientes Pediátricos, que se usó para evaluar la validad del constructo, con el coeficiente de correlación de Spearman. La fiabilidad interobservador fue evaluada por el coeficiente de correlación intraclase y por el coeficiente Kappa. Resultados El comité de 12 especialistas evaluó las equivalencias, la claridad y la relevancia de los ítems y, después de tres rondas, se llegó al 100 % de concordancia. Con las reformulaciones los ítems quedaron más comprensibles y, luego de la evaluación de la autora, se obtuvo la versión final de instrumento. Se observaron correlaciones positivas y significativas entre la Escala Humpty Dumpty y los dominios Paciente (r=0,5184; p<0,0001) y Procedimientos terapéuticos (r=0,2143; p<0,0332) del instrumento de clasificación de pacientes. En el dominio Familia (r=0,0676; p=0,5060) no se encontraron relaciones significativas. Se observaron evidencias satisfactorias de fiabilidad (coeficiente de correlación intraclase de 0,93 y coeficiente Kappa de 0,80). Conclusión The Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale fue adaptada transculturalmente y se la denominó Herramienta de Evaluación de Riesgo de Caída - Escala Humpty Dumpty. Demostró evidencias satisfactorias de validez y de fiabilidad para evaluar el riesgo de caída en infantes y adolescentes, en el contexto brasileño.

Abstract Objective To adapt and validate The Humpty Dumpty Scale for Brazilian culture. Methods Methodological study that followed the steps of translation, synthesis, back-translation, evaluation by specialists, pre-test and evaluation by the author of the original instrument for the cross-cultural adaptation. A total of 103 children/adolescents admitted to a public hospital in the countryside of the state of Sao Paulo were selected. We used a characterization form, The Humpty Dumpty Scale and the Pediatric Patient Classification Instrument, which was used to assess construct validity, with Spearman's correlation coefficient. Interobserver reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and the Kappa coefficient. Results The committee of 12 experts evaluated the equivalence, clarity and relevance of the items and after three rounds, the percentage of 100% agreement was reached. The reformulations made the items more understandable and, after the author's evaluation, the final version of the instrument was obtained. Positive and significant correlations were found between The Humpty Dumpty Scale and the Patient (r=0.5184; p<0.0001) and Therapeutic Procedures (r=0.2143; p<0.0332) domains of the patient classification instrument. With the Family domain (r=0.0676; p=0.5060), no significant relationships were achieved. Satisfactory evidence of reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.93 and Kappa coefficient of 0.80) was observed. Conclusion The Humpty Dumpty Scale was cross-culturally adapted and is now called (in Portuguese) the Ferramenta de Avaliação de Risco de Quedas - Escala Humpty Dumpty. It demonstrated satisfactory evidence of validity and reliability to assess the risk of falling in children and adolescents in the Brazilian context.

The revised Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale: An update to improve tool performance and predictive validity.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify potential modifications to the Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale (HDFS) in order to enhance the accuracy of fall prediction in the pediatric population, thus contributing to the safest possible environment for the hospitalized child. DESIGN AND METHODS: A secondary analysis of data collected by Gonzalez et al. (2020), including a total of 2428 patients, was conducted for this study. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between each parameter of the HDFS (e.g., age, gender, diagnosis, cognitive impairments, environmental factors, response to surgery/sedation/anesthesia, and medication usage) and the outcome of fall status. RESULTS: After reviewing associations between HDFS parameters and fall risk, neither gender nor medication use were found to be associated with fall risk. These two parameters were removed from the scoring algorithms, and the HDFS was modified to a minimum score of 5 and maximum score of 20, with a score of 12 or above indicative of high risk of fall. The modified scale demonstrated a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 57%. CONCLUSIONS: These revisions are anticipated to help support clinical practice and improve fall prevention, thus supporting a safer pediatric environment for the hospitalized child.

Evaluating the Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale: An International, Multisite Study.

BACKGROUND: The Humpty Dumpty Falls Prevention Program was developed to address an unmet need to identify pediatric patients at risk of a fall event. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale-Inpatient (HDFS) across a diverse, international pediatric population. In addition, the characteristics of patients who experienced a fall were analyzed. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional design was used to assess fall risk across 16 hospitals and 2238 pediatric patients. Multiple and simple logistic regressions were performed to evaluate association of individual scale items and total score with falls during hospitalization. Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the HDFS were also assessed. RESULTS: Several of the HDFS items were significantly associated with the risk of falls in the pediatric population, but specificity of the tool is a concern to consider for future tool enhancement. CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics for further refinement of the HDFS were identified.

Perceived value of national certification for pediatric nurses.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated whether pediatric nurses who were certified valued national certifications to a greater degree than those who were not certified. METHODS: The Gaberson, Schroeter, Killen, and Valentine (2003) Perceived Value of Certification Tool (PVCT) was used to measure nurses' perceptions of certification. The PVCT includes 18 certification-related value statements, using a five-point Likert scale response ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. A principal factor analysis was performed to identify clusters of related variables. RESULTS: Certified pediatric nurses valued national certifications to a greater degree than those who were not certified. More favorable views of certification were moderately associated with favorable views of the effects of certification on salary. The PVCT was found to have one factor, not two, as previously reported in the literature. Lower perceived relationships were reported between certification and salary, clinical competence, and consumer confidence compared with feelings of professionalism and personal satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Efforts to improve the relationship between certification and its perceived value at one institution were addressed. More attention may be needed to strengthen relationships, perceived or otherwise, between certification and competency skills, public awareness, and compensation of nurses for holding national certification.

The Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale: a case-control study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this descriptive study was to assess whether the Humpty Dumpty Falls Scale (HDFS) identifies hospitalized pediatric patients at high risk for falls. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was a matched case-control design. A chart review of 153 pediatric cases who fell and 153 controls who did not fall were pair-matched by age, gender, and diagnosis. RESULTS: High-risk patients fell almost twice as often as low-risk patients (odds ratio 1.87, confidence interval = 1.01, 3.53, p = .03). PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A Falls Prevention Pediatric Program with the HDFS tool addresses the Joint Commission Patient Safety Goals, but further research is needed to examine HDFS sensitivity-specificity.

A collaborative approach to expand clinical experiences and cultural awareness among undergraduate nursing students.

Nurse educators are constantly seeking opportunities to expose undergraduate students to different cultures. This requirement is essential to prepare tomorrow's nursing professionals to practice culturally component care in diverse health care environments. This article describes a unique collaborative experience between the University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing and the Miami Children's Hospital that offers senior baccalaureate students the opportunity to complete one term of clinical experience in a culturally diverse health care facility.